Every change carries the decisions that produced it
On a human team, git blame is enough, because it names someone you can go ask. When a specialist did the work, who typed it is the least useful question. What matters is the calls it made on the way there, and whether your team would have made them.
The same record follows the work across every surface
Pull requests
The change arrives with the objective it was built against and the decisions taken on the way, so a reviewer judges the work rather than reconstructing it from lines of code.
Threads in Mission Control
The live record of the work as it happens. Open a thread and the decisions, the specialists involved, and the state of the work are all still attached.
Codespeed Knowledge
Every claim says how it was known, whether that is evidence from your repository or something a person on your team confirmed, so a guess and a fact never look the same.
Governance
Authority is set by your team and visible beside the work it applies to, and every consequential action is recorded as it happens rather than reconstructed afterward.
The Specialist Team
Work is attributed to the specialist that did it, so when one specialist's analysis informs another's work, your team can see whose it was and who reviewed it.
Work the workforce raised itself
A suggestion nobody asked for arrives with the evidence behind it and the name of the specialist that raised it, so your team can back it or dismiss it on the record.